North Texas
University of North Texas · 2025 · American Athletic
North Texas went 12-2 and was ranked 21st in the FanBoardHQ CFP Rankings (blended resume and efficiency). Their 5th-ranked offense was the engine, backed by an 82nd-ranked defense. They passed the ball on 53% of offensive plays with a 6th-ranked passing attack and ran the ball on the remaining 47% of plays with a 22nd-ranked rushing attack.
Quadrant record
By opponent strength, adjusted for where the game was played.
Projected wins
Per-game win probabilities combined across the full schedule.
The resume
Every game on the schedule. Click a row for the game breakdown (played) or the matchup projection (upcoming).
| Wk | Opponent | Conf | Opp rank | Result | Exp. margin | Win prob | GameScore | Quad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Lamar | Southland | — | W 51–0 | +38.9 | 100% | 23.6 | Q4 |
| 2 | @ Western Michigan | Mid-American | #50 | W 33–30 | +11.3 | 100% | 10.0 | Q3 |
| 3 | vs Washington State | Pac-12 | #56 | W 59–10 | +11.9 | 100% | 36.7 | Q3 |
| 4 | @ Army | American Athletic | #67 | W 45–38 | +9.4 | 100% | 5.3 | Q3 |
| 5 | vs South Alabama | Sun Belt | #114 | W 36–22 | +28.3 | 100% | -0.9 | Q4 |
| 7 | vs South Florida | American Athletic | #30 | L 36–63 | +2.2 | 0% | -11.0 | Q1 |
| 8 | vs UTSA | American Athletic | #64 | W 55–17 | +13.7 | 100% | 30.0 | Q4 |
| 9 | @ Charlotte | American Athletic | #135 | W 54–20 | +35.0 | 100% | 3.8 | Q4 |
| 10 | vs Navy | American Athletic | #24 | W 31–17 | +12.7 | 100% | 17.2 | Q3 |
| 12 | @ UAB | American Athletic | #118 | W 53–24 | +27.3 | 100% | 23.9 | Q4 |
| 13 | @ Rice | American Athletic | #106 | W 56–24 | +27.3 | 100% | 17.5 | Q4 |
| 14 | vs Temple | American Athletic | #93 | W 52–25 | +23.8 | 100% | 25.2 | Q4 |
| 15 | @ Tulane | American Athletic | #26 | L 21–34 | +6.1 | 0% | -11.3 | Q2 |
| Postseason | ||||||||
| — | vs San Diego State | Mountain West | #47 | W 49–47 | +8.8 | 100% | 13.8 | Q2 |
14 played · 12-2. Expected margin and gamescore use the latest ratings — a completed game shows what the model would say now, not that week.
The season
The model’s read on North Texas, recomputed after every week. Toggle between overall, offensive, and defensive efficiency (each with a dot for that week’s game) or the FanBoardHQ CFP rank.
Passing & rushing
Opponent-adjusted, FBS-only. The bar is the blended Eff rank — EPA/play (scoring value), success rate (staying on schedule), and yards/play (explosiveness), each standardized against the FBS field. The three ranks below each bar are those components, so you can see what's driving it.
Their offense vs. what their defense allows.
Scored vs. allowed, all regular-season games.
What kind of team is this?
Every team by offensive and defensive efficiency (points/game vs. an average team, higher is better on both). Click a dot for that team.
Field position 13th · Finishing 4th
Field position 76th · Finishing 81st
3.79 points per drive on offense, 2.10 allowed — starting, on average, at their own 34.
Play-calling & efficiency
What the offense did, by quarter and by down — raw, not opponent-adjusted.
| Quarter (att.) | Pass / rush | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1(254) | 51% / 49% | 55% | 7.6 |
| Q2(262) | 58% / 42% | 47% | 6.9 |
| Q3(248) | 55% / 45% | 59% | 8.4 |
| Q4(230) | 34% / 66% | 48% | 6.6 |
| Down (att.) | Avg. to go | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st(208) | 9.9 | 58% | 9.2 |
| 2nd(170) | 7.5 | 54% | 9.4 |
| 3rd(96) | 7.2 | 40% | 7.0 |
| 4th(22) | 4.5 | 64% | 11.9 |
| All (496) | — | 53% | 9.0 |
| Down (att.) | Avg. to go | Success | Yd/play |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st(263) | 9.5 | 51% | 5.8 |
| 2nd(144) | 6.9 | 47% | 4.9 |
| 3rd(75) | 5.6 | 57% | 7.7 |
| 4th(15) | 2.3 | 80% | 5.7 |
| All (498) | — | 52% | 5.8 |
North Texas, all games.